![]() |
Forum Index : Electronics : Another Inverter Build
![]() ![]() |
|||||
Author | Message | ||||
analog8484 Senior Member ![]() Joined: 11/11/2021 Location: United StatesPosts: 135 |
I remember that from your posts. The difference I see is the lack of the very sharp and deep divots. I think that's because your inverter is so beefy compared others. That's why I was wondering if and how the very sharp and deep but single per half cycle divots actually show in the VFB. |
||||
KeepIS![]() Guru ![]() Joined: 13/10/2014 Location: AustraliaPosts: 1843 |
Although the screen capture was from a 3 stack toroid, I have tested a single toroid as well and the results are almost the same. The only thing that shows up at the VFB input to the ADC is a DC voltage. Because the VFB circuit and the ACV display on the Nano cannot calculate True and Apparent power (LOW % PF) and not being true RMS detectors, they will respond the same to any load that introduces high harmonic distortion, results will be out by a few volts, AC might be 236v instead of 230v, or 224v instead of 230v, and the AC voltage display will be also be slightly out. 99% of the time it's all good, that 1% of very low PF garbage loads are not an issue, and those voltage margins have never been an issue. Not knowing the bandwidth and sampling limitations of the small DSO means the previous waveforms "may" appear completely different on a higher spec DSO. IMHO if that waveform with divots was being presented to the VFB Input terminal at the controller PCB, I doubt it would make much or any difference to AC regulation . Edited 2025-05-19 09:09 by KeepIS NANO Inverter: Full download - Only Hex Ver 8.1Ks |
||||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Back Shed's forum code is written, and hosted, in Australia. | © JAQ Software 2025 |